In a move that has garnered widespread attention and sparked heated debate in the media world, Jimmy Kimmel has not been permanently fired or canceled. Instead, ABC has decided to indefinitely suspend his popular late-night talk show, “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”, following a controversial episode that aired on September 15th. The decision comes amid growing criticism and public backlash over comments Kimmel made during his monologue, which many viewers and critics deemed inappropriate and inflammatory. During that episode, Kimmel addressed the recent arrest of Tyler Robinson, accused of murdering conservative commentator Charlie Kirk.
In his remarks, Kimmel criticized supporters of President Donald Trump, particularly those associated with the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement. He accused them of attempting to politicize the tragedy for their own benefit, saying, “The MAGA gang was doing everything they could to portray this man as someone else and make political capital out of it.” His comments, which appeared to be aimed at condemning the politicization of the event, angered many viewers and political figures, leading to significant backlash.
The controversy quickly escalated, and former President Donald Trump expressed his opinion on social media.
Trump celebrated ABC’s decision to suspend the show and praised the network for its decision. He went a step further, urging another major network, NBC, to cancel other late-night shows like “The Tonight Show” and “Late Night with Seth Meyers.” Trump’s comments further fueled the controversy, sparking debate about freedom of expression, political bias, and the limits of comedy and commentary on late-night television. Despite the suspension, Kimmel remains under contract with ABC, which runs until May 2026. As of September 17, there has been no official announcement regarding his dismissal or permanent removal from the network.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
ABC issued a statement describing the current situation as an “indefinite suspension,” indicating that no final decision has been made regarding the show’s future. This move gives the network time to evaluate the situation, gauge public reaction, and consider the best way forward. The show’s suspension has also sparked discussion about the broader landscape of late-night television and the role of comedians and hosts in addressing sensitive political issues. Critics argue that Kimmel’s comments crossed a line that could damage the network’s reputation, while supporters argue that his right to express his views should be protected, especially in an environment of increasing political polarization.
Meanwhile, Nexstar Media Group, which broadcasts “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” on its affiliate stations, has not issued a specific statement regarding the suspension.
ABC and Kimmel’s team are struggling to deal with the fallout from this controversy, and the situation continues to escalate. Many are awaiting further updates, wondering whether the show will return to its regular schedule or face a more permanent absence, and what this incident could mean for the future of political commentary in entertainment. Underscoring the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) continued efforts to uphold broadcast integrity and public interest standards, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr issued a stern warning to major media conglomerates ABC and Disney, as well as late-night television host Jimmy Kimmel.
The warning followed a controversial monologue delivered during a YouTube episode of Benny Johnson’s show on September 17, in which Kimmel spoke about political commentator Charlie Kirk.
Carr’s statement was clear: “We can do this the easy way or the hard way,” emphasizing the FCC’s commitment to ensuring broadcasters adhere to responsible standards and serve the public interest without veering into harmful or abusive territory. During an interview with Fox News, Carr elaborated on his concerns about the current state of late-night programming, criticizing some programs for promoting a narrow political ideology at the expense of balanced discourse. He suggested that instead of acting as partisan platforms, late-night hosts should take on the role of “court jesters poking fun at all those in power,” presenting a more humorous, less politically charged perspective.
Carr expressed the view that some broadcasters have abandoned their responsibility to serve a diverse audience and instead align themselves with progressive narratives emanating from New York and Hollywood. He cited examples of broadcasters like Nexstar and Sinclair, which have taken proactive steps by pulling their programming amid controversy, asserting their rights as license holders to better serve their local communities and countering the influence of the “progressive foie gras of New York and Hollywood”—a metaphor that highlights the perceived over-concentration of liberal influence in major media outlets.
Disney’s ABC announced the indefinite suspension of Jimmy Kimmel’s show following controversy surrounding Kimmel’s comments about Charlie Kirk’s alleged murderer.
Although Carr avoided directly linking the suspension to Kimmel’s comments, he praised the decision as a demonstration of the importance of accountability in broadcasting. Carr emphasized that broadcasters must not only be responsible for their content, but also be mindful of their broader role in promoting informed and respectful public discourse. The FCC Chairman reiterated the agency’s resolve to investigate programs that undermine the principles of fairness, decency, and accuracy, signaling a renewed focus on oversight in a polarized media environment.
As debates continue over freedom of expression, political bias, and media responsibility, Carr’s comments underscore the FCC’s stance that broadcasters should prioritize the public interest over partisan entertainment or sensationalism. In a recent statement, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr strongly criticized comedian Jimmy Kimmel and accused him of misleading the public regarding the Charlie Kirk murder case. Carr called the situation a significant political event and emphasized the importance of accurate information and responsible broadcasting.
He defended Sinclair Broadcast Group’s decision to accept personal donations from Kimmel’s family and a conservative organization, which were used to fund the company’s return to broadcasting after previous issues. Carr stressed that Sinclair has every right to accept such contributions, calling it a matter of commercial autonomy and the right to freedom of expression. When asked about the possibility of NBC canceling programs hosted by Jimmy Fallon and Seth Meyers, Carr suggested that local stations have the right to make programming decisions based on their own assessment of the public interest.
He said that if a program is not considered beneficial or appropriate for viewers, stations can choose not to air it, highlighting the decentralized nature of broadcast regulation and local autonomy. Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump
He dismissed ongoing concerns about freedom of expression and media bias. He specifically criticized Kimmel, calling him “not talented” and suggesting that his suspension from certain platforms was unfair. Trump’s comments underscored his stance that mainstream media and entertainment figures often suppress conservative voices, and he described recent events as part of a broader political and cultural battle over freedom of expression. Kimmel has not yet publicly expressed his personal feelings about the suspension of his show. In a separate incident, during a recent press conference in Britain, former President Donald Trump criticized Jimmy Kimmel, specifically targeting Kimmel’s comments about Charlie Kirk. .
Trump alleged that low ratings were the primary reason for suspending Kimmel’s program, implying that viewer concerns played a significant role in the decision.
However, ABC, the network that broadcasts Kimmel’s show, strongly disputed this statement. According to ABC officials, Kimmel’s program has consistently received strong ratings, surpassing “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” among viewers aged 25 to 54 during the second quarter of the year. These figures suggest that ratings are unlikely to be the primary reason behind the suspension. The controversy has also drawn criticism from the music industry. Both the Musicians Union and the American Federation of Musicians issued statements condemning the removal of Kimmel’s show.
They called it a “direct attack on artistic expression” and expressed concern that such actions threaten the fundamental principles of freedom of expression. AFM President Tino Gagliardi expressed his disagreement and explicitly criticized the role of the Federal Communications Commission and the Trump administration in the situation. These organizations argue that the suspension undermines creative freedom and sets a worrying precedent for censorship in the entertainment industry. This ongoing debate highlights the broader tension between political influence, media freedom, and artistic expression in today’s media landscape.
About the Author
